On June 3, Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn, a party-list MP and deputy leader of the Commoners Party, in his capacity as Chair of the House Military Committee, commented on the military's readiness regarding the border dispute in Chong Bok, a contested area between Thailand and Cambodia.
He emphasized that the military’s readiness, combined with restraint and legitimate responses, would pressure both sides into negotiations.
Wiroj noted the extreme sensitivity of the Thai-Cambodian border issue. Any public commentary must be made with great caution to prevent it from being misused by the opposing side as leverage in negotiations that could disadvantage Thailand.
The committee affirmed that Lieutenant General Boonsin Padklang, Commander of the 2nd Army Region, has appropriately fulfilled his duties—defending national sovereignty strongly while keeping diplomatic channels open. The military is not seeking conflict but remains fully prepared if necessary.
Wiroj expressed understanding toward the cautious stance of security-related officials and the Foreign Ministry but urged them to inform the public that the government remains attentive and continues to monitor the situation, ready to take proportionate and timely measures according to international principles.
He asserted that Cambodia may be invoking the border issue to stir nationalism for political gain. Strong yet justified Thai responses could steer Cambodia toward peaceful negotiations.
He suggested the Ministry of Foreign Affairs urgently coordinate a Thai-Cambodian Joint Boundary Commission (JBC) meeting to seek a mutual and peaceful solution.
Wiroj also viewed Cambodia’s reported intention to bring the Chong Bok dispute before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a strategic move to boost bargaining power, pointing out the long and economically damaging process of such proceedings. He warned that a court ruling could see both countries lose and gain in different areas—ultimately leading to mutual detriment.
He concluded that while Thailand is capable of winning a conflict, such a victory would come at a devastating cost to border residents’ livelihoods and the broader economy. Therefore, peaceful resolution remains paramount, reserving the use of force only as a last resort under international norms.