On May 28, Professor Emeritus Dr. Thongchai Winichakul, along with representatives from the Cross Cultural Foundation and the Thai Lawyers for Human Rights Center, submitted a petition to the Ratchada Criminal Court. The petition calls on the Office of the Judiciary and the Department of Corrections to review the practice of shackling detainees, particularly those awaiting trial, to comply with Section 21 of the Corrections Act B.E. 2560 (2017), referencing the case of Mr. Arnon Nampa.
Dr. Thongchai emphasized that while the denial of bail and broader injustices in political cases remain pressing concerns, the prison and detention system—including the use of restraints—receives little attention. He asserted that current practices of routinely shackling defendants in court, such as Mr. Arnon, contradict the law which allows such measures only in exceptional circumstances, like preventing escape.
He clarified that advocating for Arnon is not a call for privilege, but a demand for compliance with existing legal standards. He highlighted that current practices invert the legal principle: shackling should be an exception, yet it has become standard. He called for courts to scrutinize each use of restraints and require corrections officers to justify them individually.
In a detailed public statement, Dr. Thongchai recounted the inhumane and degrading treatment Arnon has faced in court—appearing barefoot, in chains, and unable to walk freely—even when acting in his capacity as a lawyer. He urged a return to humane and lawful practices, noting that international observers are closely watching Arnon’s case due to his global recognition, including awards from human rights organizations.
He argued that revising restraint practices would not only align with legal intent but also improve Thailand’s judicial image internationally. The petition aims to benefit all detainees, advocating for a system where restraint is used only when strictly necessary and legally justified.